|
frinik
|
 |
« Reply #240 on: January 20, 2014, 09:10:14 PM » |
|
I have noticed that in NTA 1.8 the Tiger I has lost it's yellow camo. The new camo is much darker and it looks like the original black stripes that were on the original Tiger I model are visible...Why is that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #241 on: January 20, 2014, 10:17:00 PM » |
|
I have noticed that in NTA 1.8 the Tiger I has lost it's yellow camo. The new camo is much darker and it looks like the original black stripes that were on the original Tiger I model are visible...Why is that? It was firstly implemented a long time ago - November Update 2012  May I suppose that u're working in Intelligence Service?  Just kidding  The answer is simple - make skin a bit more darker with some strips. Of course, u may get back a yellow one or even make two tigers with a dif. skins. It's very easy. BTW How many units did u manage to place in the battle? At this moment I've ~100 and my PC has only 8 fps. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #242 on: January 21, 2014, 06:14:27 AM » |
|
Odd because in my versions of NTA 1.6 and 1.7 the Tiger I still has the custard yellow camo.It's only in NTA 1.8 that it became darker?  ? Why not adopt the Whukid's late war camo for the late Tiger model rather than the default orange-green-yellow one???I know the existing (default) one is correct as I have seen photographs of a Tiger painted like that but in imo Whukid's late war camo is much nicer not to say sober.... Re the intelligence service; I admit my failings but I blame it on the Ukrainian "maskirovka" tactics used by some of this forum.... Re the fps if I use small( early war) tanks such as the T26, Bts, T60 or 70, or the Panzer I, II, III, 38t and German apcs I can put 120 units on the map and get 18 to 25fps on my laptops( res 1600 X 900) , high quality in game , performance, Vsync and AA off on gpu..With larger mid or late war tanks JS, T34/85, SUs, Jagd panthers, panzers, tigers, Tigers or Panthers I can only go as high as 85 to have decent fps....No infantry no aircrafts.... On my desktop I can a little higher for both early and late war machines... I must admit that since NTA 1.6 and SPM 2.0 the framerate somewhat has improved over Beta 1.5. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #243 on: March 31, 2014, 04:28:45 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 12:13:14 PM by lockie »
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
бампер
Guest
|
|
« Reply #244 on: March 31, 2014, 05:22:52 AM » |
|
Beautiful photos.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 11:02:30 AM by бампер »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #245 on: March 31, 2014, 12:11:44 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 12:15:06 PM by lockie »
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #246 on: March 31, 2014, 02:27:49 PM » |
|
No it's a trampoLeene.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Donken
Generalmajor
Posts: 460
|
|
« Reply #247 on: March 31, 2014, 02:31:52 PM » |
|
What the name of this tank? `Panther B`  Almost correct, it was Daimler Benz prototype for the panther, its called vk3002 db =) Only one prototype made if i remember correctly vk3002 m is the one we know as the panther. Prototype made from MAN. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 02:35:54 PM by Donken »
|
Logged
|
The real heroes are those that never came back.
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #248 on: March 31, 2014, 03:08:25 PM » |
|
That's a very interesting info! It looks a very familiar to the soviet T-34.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
yl9961027
|
|
« Reply #249 on: March 31, 2014, 06:41:40 PM » |
|
Yes, because it is too similar to the T-34, it was rejected by Hitler,maybe. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 06:43:27 PM by yl9961027 »
|
Logged
|
歯車には歯車の意地がある
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #250 on: April 01, 2014, 06:27:55 AM » |
|
It was in fact an almost integral copy of the T-34 a proof that that tank had really shaken the Wehrmacht.Of course it would have been a Germa i.e improved version of the T-34 which good optics, better quality armour, better gun, radio and better ergonomics but probably too heavy and overengineered; the usual German flaws....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #252 on: June 04, 2014, 04:09:03 PM » |
|
KV-1 is still the best tank during the period 1941-42.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
kapulA
|
|
« Reply #253 on: June 04, 2014, 04:20:42 PM » |
|
In some cases yeah, but against 88s, the Pak 40 and Pz IV F2s it's about as much use as a sluggish T-34, which would pretty much be the reasoning behind phasing it out and replacing it with The Greatest Tank of WW 2  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #254 on: June 04, 2014, 05:03:02 PM » |
|
I love the Kv-1 and the KV-85 too. Yeah they had their flaws but still better tanks than the T34s which were just German tank fodder. They only gained notoriety because the Sov could produced 45 000 of them despite the heavy losses they suffered.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #255 on: June 04, 2014, 05:13:14 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 04, 2014, 05:15:17 PM by lockie »
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #256 on: June 05, 2014, 04:58:15 AM » |
|
Why the Ukrainian flag????Oh yes the T-34 was originally designed and built in Kharkov.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
бампер
Guest
|
|
« Reply #257 on: August 02, 2015, 06:32:57 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
33lima
|
|
« Reply #258 on: October 03, 2015, 07:00:13 PM » |
|
Wittmann victim at Villers Bocage:  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of his country!" when the guns begin to shoot!
'Tommy', Rudyard Kipling, 1892
|
|
|
|
Tanker
|
|
« Reply #259 on: October 06, 2015, 11:38:24 PM » |
|
Great screen shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bring back 3D markers!
|
|
|
|
