|
yl9961027
|
 |
« on: June 11, 2014, 03:16:39 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
歯車には歯車の意地がある
|
|
|
Flanker15
Generalmajor
Posts: 490
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2014, 03:59:07 AM » |
|
Hnnnnnnnnnnnng
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kyth
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2014, 04:04:07 AM » |
|
Good work!
That's much appreciated and is more representative of mid-war Shermans,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"What am I, chopped liver..?"
"Yes."
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2014, 05:10:18 AM » |
|
Bravo yl9961027 ! Excellent work and much welcome!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bidounegger
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2014, 11:45:34 AM » |
|
good work ! thanks !!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Skiv
Oberleutnant
Posts: 15
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2014, 12:36:58 PM » |
|
Hnnnnnnnnnnnng
What can I add more. Oh yea. More nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnns |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Edward1
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2014, 02:32:39 PM » |
|
Fantastic We really need one of these |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2014, 04:58:14 PM » |
|
This tank will be good addition for the desert missions!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
Ferdinand41
Oberleutnant
Posts: 9
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2014, 01:11:48 PM » |
|
Oh,uncle sam is coming!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
33lima
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2014, 11:09:18 PM » |
|
Great addition!!! Three versions would be REALLY good: 1. With no mudflaps at front or side - the usual US Army, NW Europe appearance, ideally with the wider M34A1 gun mantlet, with either cast or 3-piece bolted transmission cover: http://the.shadock.free.fr/sherman_minutia/sherman_types/m4a1/M4A1_75.JPGhttp://www.tkshare.com/pic/20110419/20110419080542707.jpeg2. British 8th Army version, with early, narrow M34 mantlet, 3-piece nose and mudflaps all around (looks most like the pictures above): http://ww2today.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/sherman-tanks-el-alamein-595x446.jpg3. Later US Army, with cast nose, T23 turret and 76mm gun http://the.shadock.free.fr/Tanks_in_France/sherman_gray/images/M4A1%20Sherman%20Gray%201.JPG |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of his country!" when the guns begin to shoot!
'Tommy', Rudyard Kipling, 1892
|
|
|
|
yl9961027
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2014, 01:58:43 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
歯車には歯車の意地がある
|
|
|
|
бампер
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2014, 02:03:55 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yl9961027
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2014, 02:23:01 PM » |
|
The mod has been completed 99%. In fact, they can already run in the game. But I don't want to release the independent mod. I would like to add them to the latest NTA mod.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
歯車には歯車の意地がある
|
|
|
Donken
Generalmajor
Posts: 460
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2014, 02:35:52 PM » |
|
This is good yl! We almost have everything for a western front mod  Good work! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The real heroes are those that never came back.
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2014, 08:37:18 PM » |
|
No we are missing many British tanks no Churchill with the 76 mm, no Cromwells, no Bishops, no fireflies, no Bren carriers and on the US side we need M24 Chafees.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2014, 08:22:15 AM » |
|
That's asking a lot!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2014, 09:50:26 AM » |
|
I know but if people want a realistic Western Front mod they are required.I personally don't care as I am fine with the East Front and the Western Front( both Italy and Normandy) was just a side show anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Txema
Generalmajor
Posts: 371
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2014, 11:10:14 AM » |
|
Come on, Frinik, US tanks are enough to cover half of the Western Front. Panzer Elite only had US tanks and it was a Western Front tank sim. The best for a very long time ! It had 40 missions covering the Tunisia, Italy and Normandy campaigns. Of course, having British tanks would be very nice but US tanks are enough to do a lot of Western Front realistic missions and campaigns. Txema |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lockie
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2014, 11:35:50 AM » |
|
Moreover, at this moment SF has already a lot of units, but no new missions except from Deviator and missions as a representatives. I don't see any reasons to make new units without missions.
Who will be bothered with missions for the Churchill (gun 76 mm) or for the Cromwells?
No need to mention abt M24 Chafees.
Of course, a new techniks it's good, but what for?
Personally, I'd prefer new houses, trees, gates, lamps, bridges, lands, grass etc.
Mostly all missions very poor designed. I mean they has the same trees and buildings.
I'd agree only with Bren carriers, coz this units designed for support, same as trucks with cover, fuel-trucks, trains, stations etc.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 17, 2014, 12:38:36 PM by lockie »
|
Logged
|
Provocative signature removed
|
|
|
|
frinik
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2014, 12:33:57 PM » |
|
Txema /Lockie; I take your point. Just giving my own take.As I said I don't really care about Western scenarios so the lack of British tanks is no skin off my nose!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
